Tu Quoque

Trying new media, getting into the spirit of things. Because you do too.

joshsternberg: firthofforth: barthel: themattsmith: the-mtblog: newsweek: Behold! What the Stop SOPA blackout managed to accomplish in 24 hours. This also reveals how distressingly ignorant many political representatives are. It seems they just blindly supported it without actually knowing what the hell it was about, and then when they were forced to find out, they learned, and changed their minds. No, the number of supporters only dropped by 15, while the number of opponents went up by 70. Which is to say: Most supporters didn’t change their minds. Most people had no preference as of Tuesday. Once their constituents made their preference known, they followed the wishes of their constituents. So if there is a technical issue like this which affects you and you would like your representative to do something about it, tell them. There’s this weird expectation that political leaders, who have to address issues concerning lots of people who aren’t you (the elderly, children, farmworkers, etc.), should have all the same information we do. That’s understandable - we assume a monolithic media environment where everyone reads and watches the same things as us, even though that hasn’t been true for a decade or so, because everyone we interact with online does have the same media diet as us - but it’s not going to protect your interests. Here are some of the things the House considered yesterday: water resources in California, oil and gas rights, increasing the debt limit, the Volcker rule, and NATO’s role in the Western Balkans. SOPA/PIPA is important, but at heart it’s about allowing the DOJ or copyright holders to get a court order that would block payments to the infringer and require their ISP to deny them service. That may make sense to you, but to everyone else it’s a highly technical, niche issue. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to impact a lot of people (so is the Volker rule, and people in the Western Balkans would probably have some feelings on NATO), it just means that you can’t just expect people who deal with a lot of different shit to naturally come to the conclusions you do. You have to tell them - or, better yet, organize and find a way to get lots of people to tell them. What happened yesterday was content providers got users to act as unpaid lobbyists, and it worked, because lobbying does. Our representatives aren’t stupid so much as they are easily distracted cats; you have to catch their attention, and if you yell the loudest, you get your way. So yell, for fuck’s sake. Don’t expect the political system to work perfectly without any input from you. And get a lot of other people to yell with you. Barthel wins. Now if we can only get people to vote…

joshsternberg:

firthofforth:

barthel:

themattsmith:

the-mtblog:

newsweek:

Behold! What the Stop SOPA blackout managed to accomplish in 24 hours.

This also reveals how distressingly ignorant many political representatives are. It seems they just blindly supported it without actually knowing what the hell it was about, and then when they were forced to find out, they learned, and changed their minds.

No, the number of supporters only dropped by 15, while the number of opponents went up by 70. Which is to say:

  • Most supporters didn’t change their minds.
  • Most people had no preference as of Tuesday.
  • Once their constituents made their preference known, they followed the wishes of their constituents.

So if there is a technical issue like this which affects you and you would like your representative to do something about it, tell them. There’s this weird expectation that political leaders, who have to address issues concerning lots of people who aren’t you (the elderly, children, farmworkers, etc.), should have all the same information we do. That’s understandable - we assume a monolithic media environment where everyone reads and watches the same things as us, even though that hasn’t been true for a decade or so, because everyone we interact with online does have the same media diet as us - but it’s not going to protect your interests. Here are some of the things the House considered yesterday: water resources in California, oil and gas rights, increasing the debt limit, the Volcker rule, and NATO’s role in the Western Balkans. SOPA/PIPA is important, but at heart it’s about allowing the DOJ or copyright holders to get a court order that would block payments to the infringer and require their ISP to deny them service. That may make sense to you, but to everyone else it’s a highly technical, niche issue. That doesn’t mean it’s not going to impact a lot of people (so is the Volker rule, and people in the Western Balkans would probably have some feelings on NATO), it just means that you can’t just expect people who deal with a lot of different shit to naturally come to the conclusions you do. You have to tell them - or, better yet, organize and find a way to get lots of people to tell them.

What happened yesterday was content providers got users to act as unpaid lobbyists, and it worked, because lobbying does. Our representatives aren’t stupid so much as they are easily distracted cats; you have to catch their attention, and if you yell the loudest, you get your way. So yell, for fuck’s sake. Don’t expect the political system to work perfectly without any input from you. And get a lot of other people to yell with you.

Barthel wins.

Now if we can only get people to vote…

(via sunfoundation)

1 month ago

  1. chinese--astrology reblogged this from newsweek
  2. prevent-baldness reblogged this from newsweek
  3. home--insurance reblogged this from newsweek
  4. oxford-marketing reblogged this from newsweek
  5. business-and-money reblogged this from newsweek
  6. butik-baju reblogged this from newsweek
  7. psychologist-brisbane reblogged this from newsweek
  8. debt---relief reblogged this from newsweek
  9. debt--management reblogged this from newsweek
  10. designerdogs1 reblogged this from urlesque
  11. yorkiepoo1 reblogged this from urlesque
  12. morkie1 reblogged this from urlesque
  13. maltipoo1 reblogged this from urlesque
  14. goldendoodle1 reblogged this from urlesque
  15. labradoodle1 reblogged this from urlesque
  16. hire-a-private-investigator reblogged this from newsweek
  17. headshot-photographer-in-ontario reblogged this from newsweek
  18. best-law-firm-in-toronto reblogged this from newsweek
  19. debt---consolidation reblogged this from newsweek
  20. debt-consolidation--loans reblogged this from newsweek
  21. logo-designer-melbourne reblogged this from newsweek
  22. electrician-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  23. supplements-2 reblogged this from newsweek
  24. buyer-review reblogged this from newsweek
  25. iphone-and-android-poker-apps reblogged this from newsweek
  26. desktop--wallpapers reblogged this from newsweek
  27. nutrisystem-reviews reblogged this from urlesque
  28. josh-2 reblogged this from newsweek
  29. ppi---claims reblogged this from newsweek
  30. ppi---claims reblogged this from newsweek
  31. missold-ppi reblogged this from newsweek
  32. massage--chair-reviews reblogged this from newsweek
  33. chat-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  34. managed-file-transfer reblogged this from newsweek
  35. cooking----games reblogged this from newsweek
  36. accountan-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  37. chris-beatty reblogged this from newsweek
  38. tt-races reblogged this from newsweek
  39. breast--augmentation reblogged this from newsweek
  40. cocuklar-icin-ingilizce reblogged this from newsweek
  41. benefits-of-flaxseed reblogged this from newsweek
  42. oro25 reblogged this from newsweek
  43. debt--consolidation reblogged this from newsweek
  44. menswear-1 reblogged this from newsweek
  45. big--booty reblogged this from newsweek
  46. online-forex--trading reblogged this from newsweek
  47. turnanzuege reblogged this from newsweek
  48. turnanzug reblogged this from newsweek
  49. voltigieranzug reblogged this from newsweek

1 ⁄ 1

- Inkhorn theme powered by Tumblr -